Music and dance in mammals
A long-standing belief among humans is that the behaviors we call making music and dancing are thought to be strictly human activities. Rapidly accumulating evidence, however, tells a different story. Both music and dance are characterized by sensitivity to and moving in response to rhythms. Among humans, these two behaviors are ubiquitous in all living cultures and can be traced back in our Neanderthal ancestors at least 50,000 years, and probably much longer. It is well established that in humans these two rhythmic behaviors play important social functions, and in recent years have been increasingly noted as well for their health benefits. All of this has called attention to similar behaviors in non-humans. Many examples have been noted among mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and even bony fish. Neurologists became interested in understanding the neural mechanisms for these rhythmic behaviors and found that rhythmic behaviors are organized in one of the most ancient parts of the vertebrate brain, namely the subcortical posterior parietal cortex which is located just on top of the uppermost ending of the spinal cord. This anatomy was then found to be the same in almost all vertebrates going back in history for many millions of years to the bony fish. So, now it is understandable why music and dance are so widespread among the vertebrates and why there seems to be the potential for these rhythmic behaviors to appear in most of the vertebrates. This discovery also emphasizes the potential availability of the beneficial effects of these behaviors. Needless to say, there is also the prospect of an emerging opportunity for much exciting and important research on mammals.
Balter, M. 2004. Seeking the key to music. Science 306:1120-1122.
Bass, A. H., E. H. Gilland, and R Baker. 2008. Evolutionary origins for social vocalization in a vertebrate hindbrain-spinal compartment. Science 321: 417-421.
Bloom, P. 2004. Can a dog learn a word? Science 304: 1605-1606.
Brown, S., and L. M. Parsons. 2008. Recent brain imaging studies reveal some of the complex neurochoreography behind our ability to dance: the neuroscience of dance. Scientific American (July): 78-83.
Canolty, R. J. 2010. Oscillatory phase coupling coordinates anatomically dispersed functional cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences B. 107(40):17356-17361.
Cook, P., et al. 2013. California sealion (Zalophus californicus) can keep the beat: motor entrainment for rhythmic auditory stimuli in a non vocal mimic. Journal of Comparative Psychology 127: 412-427.
Douglas, S. B., D. D. Heath, and D. J. Mennill. 2012. Low levels of extra-paternity in a Neotropical duetting songbird, the Ruffous- and -White wren (Thryothorus rufalbus). The Condor 114 :393-400.
Fortune, E. S., C. Rodriguez, D., D. li, G. F. Ball, and M. L. Coleman. 2011. Neural mechanisms for the coordination of duetting in singing in wrens. Science 334: 666-670.
Freeman, W. J. 1995. Societies of brains: A study in the neuroscience of love and hate. Lawrence Erdbaum Associates,Pub., Hillside, N.J., 204 pp.
Gannon, M. 2014. Chimps reveal their taste in music. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal learning and cognition.vol. 139?:
Gess, A. 2007. Birds like music, too. Science 317: 1864.
Gitler, A. D. 2011. Another reason to exercise. Science 334:606-607.
Hanna, J. L. 1983. To dance is human, a theory of non-verbal communication. University of Texas Press, 327 pp.
Hogan, P. J. 2008. More evidence on value of dance. Aging and physical activity 16:435-445.
Jensvold, M. L. A., and R. P. Gardner. 2000. Interactive use of sign language by cross-fostered chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology 114:335-346.
Kaminski, J., J. Call, and J. Fischer. 2004. Word learning in a domestic dog: evidence for fast mapping. Science 304:1682-1683.
King, B. J. 2009. The dynamic dance, non-vocal communication in African great apes. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Massachuset and London, England.
Kotz, I. 2014. Bonobos, like humans, keep time to music. Ageing and Physical Activity 16:435-445.
Large, E., and P. M. Gray. 2015. Spontaneous tempo and rhythmic entrainment in a bonobo (Pan paniscus). Journal of Comparative Psychology 29:317-328.
Lawler, A. 2012. Uncovering civilizations roots. Science 335: 790-793.
Lidicker, W. Z., Jr. 2012. Which came first, music or dance? Let’s Dance! (Folk Dance Federation of California) 69:13-14.
Loewy, J. 2013. Premature babies and music. Pediatrics162 (supplement 3 May): 902-918.
Margoliash, D., and M. Hale. 2008. Vertebrate vocalizations. Science 321: 347-348.
Mingle, M. E., T. M. Eppley, M. W. Campbell, K. Hall, V. Horner, and F. B. de Waal. 2014. Chimpanzees prefer African and Indian music over silence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition 40:502-505.
Mithin, S. 2006. The singing Neanderthals: the origin of music, language, mind, and body. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, U.S.A.
Okobi, D. E., Jr., A. Banerjee, A. M. M. Matheson, S. M. Phelps, and M. A. Long. 2019. Motor cortical control of vocal interaction in Neotropical singing mice. Science 363:983-988.
Pennisi, E. 2012. Preening the troops. Science 136:828.
Phillips-Silver, J., and L. J. Trainor. 2005. Feeling the beat: movement influences infant rhythm perception. Science 308:1430.
Powers, R. 2007. Dancing makes you smarter. Let’s Dance! (Folk Dance Federation of California) Feb.: 12-13.
Sarich, C. 2013. Research links music to increased immunity and better mood. Natural society News 14 May: 1-2. http.//www.nationofchange.org/
Schellenberg, E. G. 2004. Music lessons enhance IQ. Psychological Science 15:511-514.
Spires-Jones, T. L., and C. W. Ritchie. 2018. A mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease provides clues about why exercise is good for memory. Science 361:975-976.
Verghese, J., et al. 2003. Leisure activities and the risk of dementia in the elderly. New England Journal of Medicine 348:2508-2516.
Williams, L. 1967. The dancing chimpanzee: study of primitive music in relation to vocalizing and rhythmic actions of apes. Norton, U.S.A.
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
FACTOR DE IMPACTO 2020 (SCOPUS): 1.2
THERYA es publicada por la Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología A. C. Se distribuye bajo una Licencia de Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.
DERECHOS DE AUTOR Y DERECHOS CONEXOS, THERYA es una publicación digital cuatrimestral editada por la Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología A. C. Hacienda Vista Hermosa 107, Colonia Villa Quietud, Coyoacan 04960. Distrito Federal, México. Telefono (612) 123-8486, www.mastozoologiamexicana.org. Editor responsable: Dr. Sergio Ticul Álvarez Castañeda (email@example.com). Reservas de Derechos al Uso Exclusivo No. 04-2009-112812171700-102, ISSN: 2007-3364 ambos otorgados por el Instituto Nacional de Derechos de Autor. Responsable de la última actualización de este número, Unidad de informática de la Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología A. C. Dr. Sergio Ticul Álvarez Castañeda. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 195. La Paz, Baja California Sur, C. P. 23096. Tel 612 123 8486.