Abundance, density and habitat use of lowland paca (Cuniculus paca, Rodentia: Cuniculidae) in the Lacandon Rainforest, Chiapas, Mexico

Avril Figueroa-de-Leon, Eduardo J. Naranjo, Hugo Perales, Antonio Santos-Moreno, Consuelo Lorenzo

Resumen


In this study, the effect of relevant variables (availability of food and cavities, competition, predation, and hunting pressure) on the relative abundance and population density of the spotted lowland paca (Cuniculus paca) was assessed. In addition, habitat use of this species at three sites with different land use regime (Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve, community reserves, and anthropic sites) in the Lacandon Rainforest, Chiapas, Mexico was analysed. From the perspective of the source-sink systems, it was predicted that pacas selectively would use the habitat with higher food and cavity availability (source habitats), where higher densities were expected. Twelve transects were located in three sites with different land use regimes, where food availability and potential cavities used by pacas were assessed. Along these transects, 4 camera-traps were deployed every 200 meters to estimate the relative abundance of pacas and their potential competitors and predators. Photo-captured individuals were identified to estimate population density and seasonal variation in habitat use. Generalized linear models (GLM) were constructed to analyse the effects of several variables on paca abundance and density. A relative abundance of 0.05 and 0.08 paca photographs/100 camera-days were recorded in the dry and the rainy season, respectively. A density of 54 pacas/km2 was estimated in both seasons. The availability of cavities was the only variable that showed a significant effect on paca density (P = 0.04 for the dry season, and P = 0.006 for the rainy season). Community reserves were used in the dry season more than expected from their availability in the study area (x2 = 28.8; P = 0.0001). In the rainy season, all three sites were used by paca in proportion to their availability. Our results suggest that the cavities used as refuges by pacas drive their population dynamics, and constitute a key habitat resource for them in the study area. We propose that the Ejidal Reserve and Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve may be source habitats supporting higher paca densities and greater availability of adequate cavities to protect adults and their offspring. On the other hand, areas transformed into croplands and grasslands for livestock production would represent sink habitats with lower paca densities, less availability of adequate cavities, and absence of offspring. The long-term conservation and habitat management of pacas in transformed landscapes will probably rely on the distribution and connectivity between and within the different habitat types available in the study area.


Palabras clave


cavities; food; hunting pressure; rodent; source-sink.

Texto completo:

PDF (English) HTML (English)

Referencias


Ahumada, J. A., J. Hurtado, and D. Lizcano. 2013. Monitoring the status and trends of tropical forest terrestrial vertebrate communities from camera trap data: A tool for conservation. PLoS ONE 8:e73707.

Aquino, R., D. Gil, and E. Pezo. 2009. Aspectos ecológicos y sostenibilidad de la caza del majá (Cuniculus paca) en la cuenca del río Itaya, Amazonía peruana. Revista Peruana de Biología 16:67–72.

Aquino, R., G. Meléndez, E. Pezo, and D. Gil. 2012. Tipos y formas de ambientes de dormir de majás (Cuniculus paca) en la cuenca alta del río Itaya. Revista Peruana de Biología 19:27–34.

Aranda-Sánchez, J. M. 2012. Manual para el rastreo de mamíferos silvestres de México. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO). Ciudad de México, México.

Beck–King, H., O. Helversen, and R. Beck–King. 1999. Home Range, Population Density, and Food Resources of Agouti paca (Rodentia: Agoutidae) in Costa Rica: A Study Using Alternative Methods. Biotropica 31:675–685.

Byers, C. R., R. K. Steinhorst, and P. R. Krausman. 1984. Clarification of a technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. The Journal of Wildlife Management 48:1050-1053.

Carbone, C., S. Christie, K. Conforti, T. Coulson, N. Franklin, J. R. Ginsberg, and W. N. Shahruddin. 2001. The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals. Animal Conservation 4:75–79.

Caughley, G., A. Gunn, and K. Ralls. 1996. Conservation biology in theory and practice. Blackwell Science. Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Centeno, P., and S. Arriaga. 2010. Uso y aprovechamiento de fauna silvestre en comunidades del Parque Estatal de La Sierra, Tabasco, México. Pp. 53-77 in Uso y manejo de fauna silvestre en el norte de Mesoamérica (Guerra, M. M., S. Calmé, S. Gallina, and E. Naranjo, eds.). Secretaría de Educación del Gobierno del Estado de Veracruz. Veracruz, México.

Chalfoun, A. D., and T. E. Martin. 2007. Assessments of habitat preferences and quality depend on spatial scale and metrics of fitness. Journal of Applied Ecology 44:983-992.

Corona, M. E., and P. Enríquez. 2011. The historical use of terrestrial vertebrates in the Selva Region (Chiapas, México). Pp. 41-48 in Ethnozooarchaeology: The Present and Past of Human-animal Relationships (Albarella, U., and A. Trentacoste, eds.). Oxbow Books. Oxford, UK.

Crawley, M. J. 2005. Statistics: an introduction using R. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. New Jersey.

Cuarón, A. D. 2000. Effects of land-cover changes on mammals in a neotropical region: a modelling approach. Conservation Biology 14:1676–1692.

Díaz-Pulido, A., and E. Payán. 2012. Manual de Fototrampeo: Una herramienta de investigación para la conservación de la biodiversidad en Colombia. Instituto de Investigaciones de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt y Panthera Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia.

Dubost, G., and O. Henry. 2006. Comparison of diets of the acouchy, agouti and paca, the three largest terrestrial rodents of French Guianan forests. Journal of Tropical Ecology 22:641.

Eisenberg, J. F., and K. H. Redford. 2000. Mammals of the Neotropics: Ecuador, Bolivia, Brazil. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.

Elzinga, C. L., D. W. Salzer, J. W. Willoughby, and J. P. Gibbs. 2001. Monitoring plant and animal populations. Blackwell - Malden. Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Estrada, A., R. Coates-Estrada, and D. Meritt, Jr. 1994. Non flying mammals and landscape changes in the tropical rain forest region of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Ecography 17:229–241.

Figueroa-de-León, A., E. J. Naranjo, H. Perales, A. Santos-Moreno, and C. Lorenzo. 2016a. Cavity occupancy by lowland paca (Cuniculus paca) in the Lacandon Rainforest, Chiapas, Mexico. Tropical Conservation Science 9:246-263.

Figueroa-de León, A., E. J. Naranjo, H. Perales, A. Santos-Moreno, and C. Lorenzo. 2016b. Availability and characterization of cavities used by pacas (Cuniculus paca) in the Lacandon Rainforest, Chiapas, Mexico.  Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 87:1062-1068.

Gallina, S., J. Pérez-Torres, and C. C. Guzmán-Aguirre. 2012. Use of the paca, Cuniculus paca (Rodentia: Agoutidae) in the Sierra de Tabasco State Park, Mexico. Revista de Biología Tropical 60:1345–1355.

Ganesh, T., and P. Davidar. 1999. Fruit biomass and relative abundance of frugivores in a rain forest of southern Western Ghats, India. Journal of Tropical Ecology 15:399–413.

Hanski, I., and D. Simberloff. 1997. The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain, and application to conservation. Pp. 5-26 in Metapopulation Biology (Hanski, I., and M. E. Gilpin, eds.). Academic Press. San Diego, U. S. A.

Instituto Nacional de Ecología - ine. 2000. Programa de Manejo Reserva de la Biosfera Montes Azules. INE. Ciudad de México, México.

Instituto nacional de Estadística y Geografía - INEGI. 2010. Consulta de Localidades ITER 2010. www.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/consulta_resultados/iter2010.aspx

Jax, E., S. Marín, A. Rodríguez-Ferraro, and E. Isasi-Catalá. 2015. Habitat use and relative abundance of the Spotted Paca Cuniculus paca (Linnaeus, 1766) (Rodentia: Cuniculidae) and the Red-rumped Agouti Dasyprocta leporina (Linnaeus, 1758) (Rodentia: Dasyproctidae) in Guatopo National Park, Venezuela. Journal of Threatened Taxa 7:6739-6749.

Johnson, D. H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61:65–71.

Karanth, K. U., and J. D. Nichols. 1998. Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79:2852–2853.

Laska, M., J. M. Luna Baltazar, and E. Rodriguez Luna. 2003. Food preferences and nutrient composition in captive pacas, Agouti paca (Rodentia, Dasyproctidae). Mammalian Biology 68:31–41.

Maffei, L., and A. J. Noss. 2008. How Small is too small? Camera Trap survey areas and density estimates for ocelots in the Bolivian Chaco. Biotropica 40:71–75.

McCullagh, P., and J. A. Nelder. 1989. Generalized linear models. CRC Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. Springer Verlag. New York, U. S. A.

Monroy-Vilchis, O., M. M. Zarco-González, C. Rodríguez-Soto, L. Soria-Díaz, and V. Urios. 2011. Fototrampeo de mamíferos en la Sierra Nanchititla, México: abundancia relativa y patrón de actividad. Revista de Biología Tropical 59:373-383.

Morrison, M. L., B. Marcot, and W. Mannan. 2006. Wildlife-Habitat Relationships: Concepts and Applications. Island Press. Washington, U. S. A.

Muñoz, J., O. Betancur, and M. Duque. 2002. Patrones de hábitat y de actividad nocturna de Agouti paca en el Parque Nacional Utría (Chocó, Colombia). Actualidades Biológicas 24:75–85.

Naranjo, E. J., M. M. Guerra, R. E. Bodmer, and J. Bolanos. 2004. Subsistence hunting by three ethnic groups of the Lacandon forest, Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology 24:233–253.

Naranjo, E. J., S. A. Amador-Alcala, F. A. Falconi-Briones, and R. A. Reyna-Hurtado.  2015. Distribución, abundancia y amenazas a las poblaciones de tapir centroamericano (Tapirus bairdii) y pecarí de labios blancos (Tayassu pecari) en México. Therya 6: 227-249.

Neu, C. W., C. R. Byers, and J. M. Peek. 1974. A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. Journal of Wildlife Management 38:541–545.

O’Connell, A. F., J. D. Nichols, and K. U. Karanth (eds.). 2010. Camera traps in animal ecology: methods and analyses. Springer Science and Business Media. New York.

Pérez, E. M. 1992. Agouti paca. Mammalian Species 404:1–7.

Potts, G., J. Coulson, and I. Deans. 1980. Population dynamics and breeding success of the shag, Phalacrocorax aristotelis, on the Farne Islands, Northumberland. The Journal of Animal Ecology 49:465–484.

Pulliam, H., and B. Danielson. 1991. Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. American Naturalist 137:S50-S66.

R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. v3.3-1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.

Sherry, T., and R. Holmes. 1988. Habitat selection by breeding American Redstarts in response to a dominant competitor, the Least Flycatcher. The Auk 105:350–364.

Sherry, T., and R. Holmes. 1989. Age-specific social dominance affects habitat use by breeding American redstarts (Setophaga ruticilla): a removal experiment. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 25:327–333.

Urquiza-Haas, T., C. A. Peres, and P. M. Dolman. 2009. Regional scale effects of human density and forest disturbance on large-bodied vertebrates throughout the Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico. Biological Conservation 142:134–148.

Vásquez-Sánchez, M., and M. Ramos. 1992. Reserva de la Biosfera Montes Azules; Selva Lacandona: Investigación para su conservación. Centro de Estudios para la Conservación de los Recursos. Ecosfera. Available at: https://scholar.google.com.mx/scholar?hl=es&q=Vasquez+y+Ramos+1992&btnG=&lr=

Venables, W. N., and B. D. Ripley. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S (Fourth). Springer. New York, U. S. A.

Wallace, R. B., and L. E. Painter. 2003. Metodologías para medir la fenología de fructificación y su análisis con relación a los animales frugívoros. Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Mayor de San Andrés. La Paz, Bolivia.

Weitlaner, R. J. 1997. Relatos, mitos y leyendas de la Chinantla. Instituto Nacional Indigenista. Colección INI 58. Ciudad de México, México.

Ye, X., A. K. Skidmore, and T. Wang. 2013. Within-patch habitat quality determines the resilience of specialist species in fragmented landscapes. Landscape Ecology 28:135-147.

Zeileis, A., and T. Hothorn. 2002. Diagnostic checking in regression relationships. R News 2:7-10.

Zucaratto, R., R. Carrara, and B. K. Siqueira. 2010. Dieta da paca (Cuniculus paca) usando métodos indiretos numa área de cultura agrícola na Floresta Atlântica brasileira. Biotemas 23:235–239.


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.


FACTOR DE IMPACTO 2020 (SCOPUS): 1.2


THERYA es publicada por la Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología A. C.  Se distribuye bajo una Licencia de Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.

DERECHOS DE AUTOR Y DERECHOS CONEXOS, THERYA es una publicación digital cuatrimestral editada por la Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología A. C.  Hacienda Vista Hermosa 107, Colonia Villa Quietud, Coyoacan 04960.  Distrito Federal, México.  Telefono (612) 123-8486, www.mastozoologiamexicana.org.  Editor responsable: Dr. Sergio Ticul Álvarez Castañeda (therya@cibnor.mx).  Reservas de Derechos al Uso Exclusivo No. 04-2009-112812171700-102, ISSN: 2007-3364 ambos otorgados por el Instituto Nacional de Derechos de Autor.  Responsable de la última actualización de este número, Unidad de informática de la Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología A. C.  Dr. Sergio Ticul Álvarez Castañeda.  Instituto Politécnico Nacional 195.  La Paz, Baja California Sur, C. P. 23096.  Tel 612 123 8486.