Morphometric patterns in assemblages of Cricetid rodents from the Central and Western Cordilleras of Colombia

Edilson Patiño-Castillo, Sergio Solari

Resumen


The mechanisms that mediate the formation and coexistence of species assemblages have been a historical issue in evolutionary ecology, raising the question of whether these assemblages are shaped at random or are influenced by biotic and abiotic processes.  An increasingly popular hypothesis points out that certain patterns or "assemblage rules" determine coexistence patterns within assemblages at a regional or continental scale.  Thus, morphological and ecological similarities could influence the degree and intensity of competition between species.  Considering the morphology of organisms within an environmental framework, we could assess the morphology and understand the ecological role of a given species within the assemblage.  This study assesses the similarities and differences of Andean rodents within local assemblages through a Principal Component Analysis (PCA), using craniodental characters of these species to establish whether the relationships between morphometry and coexistence provide evidence to explain assemblage structure patterns.  We measured rodent specimens deposited in the Colección Teriológica of the University of Antioquia, collected from the Western and Central cordilleras of Colombia.  We recorded 15 craniodental variables from all specimens, which were analyzed with a PCA to search for a general organization pattern within assemblages.  Afterwards, we plotted the scores for principal components 1 and 2 to evidence the separation or clustering of specimens in an Euclidean space.  We recorded 424 specimens from 10 genera and 18 species of the family Cricetidae, with the genera Nephelomys and Thomasomys showing the largest number of specimens.  In the overall PCA, the first three components account for 85.1 % of the variation, with 63.9 % for PC1.  The variables with the greatest contributions to PC1 were APZ, AA and AFM; to PC2, LFI, APZ and AFM; and to PC3, LFI, LO and LHM.  We detected some overlapping and scattering patterns among species at the morphospace defined by PC1 and PC2.

We recovered an arrangement of species that shows differences in size and shape between them (as a function of their morphology), as evidenced in the scatter plots for the regional and local analyses.  Besides, we did not find a general pattern for the load of variables, although some of these accounted for a larger part of the variation in the overall and local analyses (APZ, AFM, LFI, LHM and AR), indicating the segregation among species. Although the local analyses revealed a similar pattern with these loads changing from site to site, five variables account for the largest variation, what we interpret as a key role to determine the morphometric and/or ecological segregation among species.  We believe this first approximation shows the value of ecomorphological studies in understanding patterns of diversity and geographic replacement of species; these patterns should be integrated with analyses of ecological aspects to understand the coexistence of species within local assemblages. 

 


Palabras clave


Análisis de componentes principales; ecología evolutiva; morfometría; reglas de ensamblaje; roedores andinos.

Texto completo:

PDF (English) HTML (English)

Referencias


ADAMS, D. C. 2007. Organization of Pletodon salamander communities: guild-based community assembly. Ecology 88:1292-1299.

ARITA, H. T. 1997. Species composition and morphological structure of the bat fauna of Yucatan, Mexico. Journal of Animal Ecology 66:83-97.

BOWERS, M. A., AND J. H. BROWN. 1982. Body size and coexistence in desert rodents: chance or community structure? Ecology 63:391-400.

BRUSEO, J. A., AND R. E. BARRY. 1995. Temporal activity of syntopic Peromyscus in the Central Appalachians. Journal of Mammalogy 76:78-82.

CONNOR, E. F., AND D. SIMBERLOFF. 1979. The Assembly of Species Communities: Chance or Competition? Ecology 60:1132-1140.

CRISCI, J. V., AND M. F. LÓPEZ-A. 1983. Introducción a la teoría y práctica de la taxonomía numérica. Secretaría General de la Organización de Estados Americanos (OEA). Washington, U S. A.

DIAMOND, J. M. 1975. Assembly of species communities. Pp. 342-444, in Ecology and evolution of communities (Cody, M., and J. M. Diamond, eds.). Harvard University Press. Cambridge, U S. A.

FAUTH, J. E., J. BERNARDO, M. CAMARA, W. J. RESETARITS, J. VAN BUSKIRK, AND S. A. MCCOLLUM. 1996. Simplifying the jargon of community ecology: a conceptual approach. The American Naturalist 147:282-286.

FINDLEY, J. S. 1975. The structure of bat communities. The American Naturalist 110:129-139.

FREEMAN, P. W. 1981. A multivariate study of the family Molossidae (Mammalia, Chiroptera): morphology, ecology, evolution. Fieldiana, Zoology, new series 7:1-173.

GIMÉNEZ, A., AND N. GIANNINI. 2011. Morphological and geographic segregation among species of lasiurine bats (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from the South American southern cone. Mammalia 75:173-179.

GÓMEZ-VALENCIA, B. 2006. Estructura de la comunidad de pequeños mamíferos en un gradiente altitudinal, Reserva Río Blanco, Manizales, Caldas, Colombia [Trabajo de pregrado]. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia.

GOTELLI, N. J., AND A. M. ELLISON. 2002. Assembly rules for New England ant communities. Oikos 99:591-599.

GOULD, S. J. 1966. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biological Reviews 41:587-640.

HAMMER, Ø., D. A. HARPER, AND P. D. RYAN. 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4:9.

JAMES, F. C., AND C. E. MCCULLOCH. 1990. Multivariate Analysis in Ecology and Systematics: Panacea or Pandora's Box? Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21:129-166.

JACKSON, D. A. 1993. Stopping rules in principal components analysis: a comparison of heuristical and statistical approach. Ecology 74:2204-2214.

LANDRY, S. 1970. The Rodentia as omnivores. The Quarterly Review of Biology 45:351-372.

LÓPEZ-ARÉVALO, H., O. MONTENEGRO-DÍAZ, AND A. CADENA. 1993. Ecología de los pequeños mamíferos de la Reserva Biológica Carpanta, en la Cordillera Oriental colombiana. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 28:93-210.

LORENZO, C., L. CUAUTLE, E. ESPINOZA, AND M. GARCÍA. 2006. Intraspecific variation in Peromyscus zarhynchus (Rodentia: Muridae) from Chiapas, Mexico. Journal of Mammalogy 87:683-689.

MONTENEGRO-DÍAZ, O., H. LÓPEZ-ARÉVALO, AND A. CADENA. 1991. Aspectos ecológicos del roedor arborícola Rhipidomys latimanus Tomes, 1860 (Rodentia, Cricetidae) en el oriente de Cundinamarca, Colombia. Caldasia 16:565-572.

MORENO, C. E., H. T. ARITA, AND L. SOLIS. 2006. Morphological assembly mechanisms in Neotropical bat assemblages and ensembles within a landscape. Oecologia 149:133–140.

MUÑOZ-SABA, Y., J. O. RANGEL, AND A. CADENA. 2000. Mamíferos. Pp. 599-611, in Colombia: Diversidad Biótica III. La Región de vida Paramuna (Rangel, J.O., ed.). Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia.

NORMAN, G. R., AND D. L. STREINER. 1996. Bioestadística. Harcourt Brace, Edición en español. Madrid, España.

OTAROLA-ARDILA, A. 2003. Mamíferos de los bosques de roble. Acta Biológica Colombiana 8:57-71.

PATTERSON, B. D. 1999. Contingency and determinism in mammalian biogeography: the role of history. Journal of Mammalogy 80:345-360.

PATTON, J. L., M. N. F. DA SILVA, AND J. R. MALCOLM. 2000. Mammals of the Rio Juruá and the evolutionary and ecological diversification of Amazonia. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 244:1-306.

PATTON, J. L., U. F. PARDIÑAS, AND G. D’ELÍA. 2015. Mammals of South America, Volume 2: Rodents. University of Chicago Press. Chicago, U S. A.

PERCEQUILLO, A. R. 2003. Sistemática de Oryzomys Baird, 1858: definição dos grupos de espécies e revisão taxonômica do grupo albigularis (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae) [Tesis doctoral]. Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo, Brasil.

PERES-NETO, P. R., D. A. JACKSON, AND K. M. SOMERS. 2003. Giving meaningful interpretation to ordination axes: assessing loading significance in principal component analysis. Ecology 84:2347–2363.

PIANKA, E. R. 1973. The structure of lizard communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4:53-74.

PIZZIMENTI, J. J., AND R. DE SALLE. 1980. Dietary and morphometric variation in some Peruvian rodent communities: the effect of feeding strategy on evolution. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 13:263-285.

RICKLEFS, R. E., AND J. TRAVIS. 1980. A morphological approach to the study of avian community organization. The Auk 97:321-338.

SÁNCHEZ, F., P. SÁNCHEZ-PALOMINO, AND A. CADENA. 2004. Inventario de mamíferos en un bosque de los Andes centrales de Colombia. Caldasia 26: 291-309.

SÁNCHEZ-GIRALDO, C., AND J. F. DÍAZ-NIETO. 2015. Dynamics of species composition of small nonvolant mammals from the northern Cordillera Central of Colombia. Mammalia 79:385-397.

SOLARI, S. 2007. Trophic relationships in a highland rodent assemblage of Manu National Park, Cusco, Peru. Pp. 225-240, in The Quintessential Naturalist: honoring the Life and Legacy of Oliver P. Pearson (Kelt, D.A., E. Lessa, J. Salazar-Bravo, and J. L. Patton, eds.). University of California Publications in Zoology, 134. University of California Press. Los Angeles, U S. A.

SORIANO, P., A. DÍAZ DE PASCUAL, J. OCHOA, AND M. AGUILERA. 1999. Las comunidades de roedores de los Andes Venezolanos. Acta Zoológica Mexicana, volumen especial 1998:211-226

VIANCHA-SÁNCHEZ, A., J. CEPEDA-GÓMEZ, E. MUÑOZ-LÓPEZ, A. HERNÁNDEZ-OCHOA, AND L. ROSERO-LASPRILLA. 2012. Mamíferos pequeños no voladores del Parque Natural Municipal Ranchería, Paipa, Boyacá, Colombia. Revista Biodiversidad Neotropical 2:37-44.

VITT, L. J., S. S. SARTORIUS, T. S. C. AVILA-PIRES, M. C. ESPOSITO, AND D. B. MILES. 2000. Niche segregation among sympatric Amazonian teiid lizards. Oecologia 122:410-420.

VOSS, R. S. 2003. A new species of Thomasomys (Rodentia: Muridae) from Eastern Ecuador with remarks on mammalian diversity and biogeography in the Cordillera Oriental. American Museum Novitates 3421:1-47.

VOSS, R. S., M. GÓMEZ-LAVERDE, AND V. PACHECO. 2002. A new genus for Aepeomys fuscus Allen, 1912, and Oryzomys insectus Thomas, 1921: enigmatic Murid rodents from the Andean cloud forest. American Museum Novitates 3373:1-42.

VOSS, R. S., D. P. LUNDE D. P., AND N. B. SIMMONS. 2001. The mammals of Paracou, French Guiana: a Neotropical lowland rainforest fauna Part 2. Nonvolant species. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 263:1-236.

WEKSLER, M., AND A. R. PERCEQUILLO. 2011. Key to the genera of the tribe Oryzomyini (Rodentia: Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae). Mastozoología Neotropical 18:281-292.

WILLIG, M. R. 1986. Bat community structure in South America: a tenacious chimera. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 52:151-168.

WILLIG, M. R., AND M. P. MOULTON. 1989. The role of stochastic and deterministic processes in structuring Neotropical bat communities. Journal of Mammalogy 70:323-329.


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.


FACTOR DE IMPACTO 2017 (SCOPUS): 0.58


Therya es publicada por la Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología A. C.  Se distribuye bajo una Licencia de Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.

DERECHOS DE AUTOR Y DERECHOS CONEXOS, THERYA es una publicación cuatrimestral editada por la Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología A. C.  Hacienda Vista Hermosa 107, Colonia Villa Quietud, Coyoacan 04960.  Distrito Federal, México.  Telefono (612) 123-8486, www.mastozoologiamexicana.org.  Editor responsable: Dr. Sergio Ticul Álvarez Castañeda (therya@cibnor.mx).  Reservas de Derechos al Uso Exclusivo No. 04-2009-112812171700-102, ISSN: 2007-3364 ambos otorgados por el Instituto Nacional de Derechos de Autor.  Responsable de la última actualización de este número, Unidad de informática de la Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología A. C.  Dr. Sergio Ticul Álvarez Castañeda.  Instituto Politécnico Nacional 195.  La Paz, Baja California Sur, C. P. 23096.  Tel 612 123 8486.